logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1997. 10. 28. 선고 96다38032 판결
[손해배상(기)][공1997.12.1.(47),3625]
Main Issues

The criteria for determining whether the article of the press media impairs its reputation

Summary of Judgment

Defamation refers to all acts that undermine the social evaluation of a certain person, and whether a media, such as a newspaper or magazine, carries an article about a specific person, constitutes defamation shall be determined based on the overall appearance of the article on the premise of the objective contents of the article, as well as on the overall flow of the article, the ordinary meaning of the used words, and the connection method of phrases, etc., on the premise of the ordinary method in which the general readers contact an article.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 751 and 764 of the Civil Act, Article 309 of the Criminal Act

Plaintiff, Appellee

Kim Young-soo (Law Firm LLC, Attorneys Kim Young-chul et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Defendant 1 and two others (Attorney Choi Jong-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 96Na5348 delivered on July 25, 1996

Text

All appeals are dismissed. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

The court below held that, in light of the contents of the article of this case, the article should be based on the overall appearance of the article on the premise of the objective contents of the article, the ordinary meaning of the words used, the connection method of the phrases, etc. when the article is published by the media such as newspapers and magazines, and the contents of the article of this case, which affected the social assessment of a certain person, should be considered as the standard for its determination. In light of the contents of the article of the "Dalcheoncheon Korea" and the contents of the articles before and after the article of this case, the court below held that the article of this case should be considered as the basis for its determination. However, the court below's determination that the article of this case was harmful to the plaintiff's social coverage and the defendant 1, the news report of the article of this case and the publication of the article of this case that the article of this case was published by the plaintiff's news gathering as the source of the news report and the publication of the article of this case's news report as well as the publication of the article of this case's article of this case.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee Im-soo (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1996.7.25.선고 96나5348