logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1990. 6. 8. 선고 90도77 판결
[국가공무원법위반][공1990.8.1.(877),1498]
Main Issues

Whether Article 66 (1) of the State Public Officials Act concerning the prohibition of collective action by public officials is unconstitutional (negative)

Summary of Judgment

Article 66 (1) of the State Public Officials Act prohibiting collective action by a public official is not a law that violates Articles 11 (1), 21 (1), 31 (4), 33 (b) and 37 (2) of the Constitution.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 66(1) of the State Public Officials Act, Articles 11(1), 21(1), 31(4), 33 and 37(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 90Do332 delivered on April 10, 1990 (Gong1990, 1104) 90Do497 delivered on May 11, 1990 (Gong1990, 1305) 90Do331 delivered on June 8, 1990 (Dong)

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu District Court Decision 89No1513 delivered on December 1, 1989

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

As to the Defendant’s ground of appeal

Article 66(1) of the State Public Officials Act cannot be deemed as a law in violation of Articles 11(1), 21(1), 31(4), 33(b) and 37(2) of the Constitution. The arguments are groundless.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Yoon Young-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow