logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1985. 1. 22. 선고 84누644 판결
[제2차납세의무자지정처분취소][공1985.3.15.(748),378]
Main Issues

Scope of taxes for which a business transferee is liable for secondary tax payment;

Summary of Judgment

Under the provisions of Article 41 of the Framework Act on National Taxes, the national taxes, additional dues and disposition fees for arrears for which the business transferee is liable for the secondary tax liability are already imposed on the transferor at the time of the transfer of the business.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 41 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 80Nu150 Decided September 9, 1980, 83Nu63 Decided November 22, 1983, Supreme Court Decision 83Nu45 Decided December 13, 1983, Supreme Court Decision 83Nu705 Decided April 24, 1984

Plaintiff-Appellee

Sung General Forestry Construction Corporation

Defendant-Appellant

The Director of Gangnam District Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 84Gu164 delivered on August 24, 1984

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Reasons

The defendant's grounds of appeal are examined.

Article 41 of the Framework Act on National Taxes requires that the national tax, additional dues, and expenses for disposition on default imposed on the transferor at the time of the transfer of the business is the tax already imposed on the transferor pursuant to the provisions of Article 41 of the same Act. Since the opinion is expressed on the part of the party members (see Supreme Court Decision 80Nu150 delivered on September 9, 1980; Supreme Court Decision 83Nu63 delivered on November 22, 1983; Supreme Court Decision 83Nu45 delivered on December 13, 1983). In this regard, the court below decided that the plaintiff was not imposed on the non-party company at the time of the transfer of the construction business from the non-party company and decided that the disposition on the non-party company's second tax payment was unlawful, and it cannot be said that there was an error of incomplete deliberation or misunderstanding of legal principles as to the second tax payment obligation.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of the appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kim Jong-sik (Presiding Justice)

arrow