logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1990. 1. 12. 선고 89누558 판결
[양도소득세등부과처분취소][공1990.3.1(867),471]
Main Issues

Whether the transaction price of the shares transferred with the management right of the company can be seen as the market price of the shares (negative)

Summary of Judgment

If shares issued by a company are transferred together with the management right of the company, the transaction price shall not be the market price that reflects the objective exchange value when only shares are transferred.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 5 (1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Inheritance Tax Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 80Nu543 Decided February 23, 1982, 85Nu208 Decided September 24, 1985, Supreme Court Decision 88Nu9565 Decided July 25, 1989

Plaintiff-Appellee

[Defendant-Appellee] Plaintiff 1 and 1 other

Defendant-Appellant

Head of Gwangju District Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 87Gu1074 delivered on December 15, 1988

Notes

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Due to this reason

As to the grounds of appeal by Defendant Litigation Performers:

If shares issued by a company are transferred together with the management right of the company, the transaction price cannot be considered as the general market price that reflects the objective exchange value when only shares are transferred (see Supreme Court Decision 80Nu543, Feb. 23, 1982; Supreme Court Decision 85Nu208, Sept. 24, 1985; Supreme Court Decision 88Nu9565, Jul. 25, 1989).

Therefore, the court below is just in holding that there is no evidence to acknowledge that there is no special circumstance that can reasonably reflect the objective exchange value of the stock itself with the management right of the company, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to stock transfer or incomplete hearing, such as theory of lawsuit, etc. It is groundless to view that there is no such special circumstance as the market price to properly reflect the objective exchange value of the stock itself.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Yoon Young-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-서울고등법원 1988.12.15.선고 87구1074