1. The defendant A shall be sentenced to six months of imprisonment and a fine of five thousand won;

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On July 4, 2017, Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on the 12th of the same month to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of giving bribe in the support of the Southern District Court of the Jeonju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

[2] Defendant A, a public official of Grade VI in charge of the general culture and arts and cultural facilities of the I Viewing State, appointed as the I Viewing local construction clerk on August 1, 1997, and served in the I Viewing Industry Construction Department from September 22, 1998. From August 20, 2010 to January 19, 2017, before he/she was transferred to the department in charge of culture and arts and cultural facilities as above, Defendant A had been in charge of various authorization and permission related to construction, large-scale repair, change of purpose of use, temporary building permission (large-scale repair and non-residential building construction of more than 661 square meters and non-residential building of more than 495 square meters), and has been in charge of various authorization and permission related to construction, including building permission, reporting on change of building-related persons, approval of temporary use and temporary use, management of certified architect, control of illegal and removal of buildings.

Defendant

B, as an industrial engineer in the building industry in J, operated a building office in the name of K, and applied for various authorizations related to the construction design and supervision by customers, and maintained a friendly relationship with Defendant A, who is one of his high schools and universities, and since 2008 where the new construction administrative system was introduced, Defendant A had been provided with convenience such as prompt consultation or shortening the existing processing period through the person in charge of the relevant department, when consultation with the relevant department is necessary with respect to various authorizations related to the construction applied by Defendant B.

1. On March 30, 2012, Defendant A could not receive a normal loan from a financial right, such as where the wage account was seized at the time of receiving a demand for repayment of obligation from L around March 30, 2012. Defendant A bears obligations for relatives and relatives, and accordingly, he/she is obliged to prepare the said money.