A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Illegal events of official documents;

A. On July 4, 2014, at around 00:15, the Defendant was required to present an identification card to verify personal information by the Inspector F, a police officer belonging to the Busan Coastal Police Station E Zone, who was dispatched to the scene upon a assault report from D located in Busan B, Busan, on the ground of the assault report.

The defendant, who is a public document issued by the Commissioner of the Busan Local Police Agency, presented his official document as if he was the defendant's driver's license.

B. On July 4, 2014, around 02:36, the Defendant was required to present an identification card to verify personal information by the police officer, a police officer belonging to the above police station, prior to being examined in the office and an office located in Busan.

The defendant, who is a public document issued by the Commissioner of the Busan Local Police Agency, presented his official document as if he was the defendant's driver's license.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On July 4, 2014, at around 01:45, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender on an assault case at the head of the Dong-gu Police Station E District Office located in Busan, and, in order to be exempted from punishment for a police officer who was a police officer belonging to the above police station to sign and seal a written confirmation of arrest, he/she took place as if he/she was G, and signed G in the column where the confirmation of the suspension of arrest is confirmed, and had F file the said written confirmation with the investigative record.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the G’s signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

B. On July 4, 2014, around 03:10 on July 4, 2014, when the Defendant was to be examined as a case of assault in the crime of the Japanese Police Station and the office located in the Busan Coast Guard, the Defendant was to conduct the investigation as G. After being examined, G’s signature was made in the confirmation column, such as the person who made a statement at the end of the interrogation protocol and the right to refuse to make a statement, and had a slope H, the investigating police officer, bound the said protocol to

In this respect.