logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.23 2016고단6080
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 10:10 on July 18, 2016, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 200 meters from the 184-25 Do, Nam-gu Incheon, Incheon, to the front road of the 353-23 Do, from the 184-25 Do, to the 353-23 Do, respectively.

2. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document: (a) was discovered as a violation of signal and requested to produce a driver’s license from a slopeD belonging to the Incheon Southern Police Station C District District D; (b) the Defendant, an official document issued by the Commissioner of the Gyeonggi-do Police Agency, in the course of being invaded, presented a first-class ordinary driver’s license to East E to the said D, as if he was the Defendant’s driver’s license for himself; and (c) exercised the said driver’s license, which is an official document.

3. At around 11:51 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender under the charge of driving without a license at the Incheon Southern Police Station located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon; (b) was arrested as a flagrant offender under the charge of driving without license; and (c) was examined by the police officer in the above police station; and (d) entered “E” in the interrogation protocol prepared by the above F in the “E” column.

The defendant, for the purpose of exercising his authority, forged the signature of the above E without authority.

4. At the same time and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (3), the Defendant: (a) submitted the interrogation protocol containing the above E’s signature to the above F, who knew of the signature forgery, and had F bound the above protocol to be bound into investigation records; and (b) exercised such forged signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. The register of driver's licenses and written arrest of flagrant offenders;

1. Entry of the part concerning signature of E in the police interrogation protocol under the name of E and the application of existing statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting the crime; and

arrow