A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2017, the Defendant, as a person of illegal stay in Vietnam’s nationality, was investigated by the police station as a theft of another person’s door-to-door box owned by another person at the D convenience store, following the Defendant’s investigation at the police station around 15, 2017. On the other hand, the Defendant had expressed mind that “E”, who left the identification card on the existing Internet to conceal the illegal stay.

1. On June 24, 2017, around 19:55 on June 24, 2017, the Defendant appeared as the victim of the theft case committed on June 15, 2017 at the Asan-si Police Station investigation and F around June 15, 2017, the Defendant, without authority, stated “E” at the end of the suspect interrogation protocol that he/she was investigated, with the intention to use as “E” and, without authority, stated the “E” at the end of the suspect interrogation protocol that he/she was investigated, and delivered it as if he/she was duly formed with G at the border of the police station where he/she is aware of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant forged E's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

2. On July 21, 2017, the Defendant was present at around 20:33 around July 21, 2017 at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) and on May 27, 2017 at the same time as indicated in paragraph (1), and was investigated by being present at the victim of the larceny incident who committed around 17:05 on May 27, 2017, the Defendant forged the E’s signature in the same manner and issued it to the mitigated H who is unaware of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant forged E's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

3. On August 6, 2017, the Defendant appeared at around 10:35, on August 6, 2017, at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around 10:35, and around May 27, 2017, at the same time as indicated in paragraph (1), and was investigated twice, and forged E’s signature and delivered it to the head of the police station affiliated with the said police station in the same manner as above, without knowledge of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant forged E's signature and exercised it for the purpose of exercising it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and J;

1. A copy of the self-examination protocol (related to heading 2017-4419);