beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 5, 2014, the Defendant was driving at the section B of about 15km from the front side of a fluoral farm in the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.089% without obtaining a driver’s license on March 20:38, 2014, the Defendant driven the fluoral fluoral fluor from the front side of the fluoral flus
2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and, at the same time and place specified in paragraph (1), controlled the Defendant and demanded the Defendant to inform him of the presentation of driver’s license and personal information from the police officer D belonging to the Jin-nam Police Station C, Jin-nam Police Station, for the Defendant to inform him of the Defendant that the Defendant would engage in the act as if he was the Defendant’s friendship, and to make the said police officer know of the fact prepare a notification of the results of the drinking driving regulation in which the E’s personal information is stated, and to exercise the right to sign the said notification made in PDA, signed “E” in the driver’s column for the purpose of enabling the said police officer to prepare a notification of the results of the drinking driving control in which the E’s personal information is stated, and
Accordingly, the Defendant forged E’s signature for the purpose of exercising, and used forged signature.
3. The Defendant forged a private document, or uttering of a falsified investigation document, committed an act of drinking under the influence of alcohol at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), with the intent of having a police officer F, who belongs to the Jinnam Police Station C, enter the above E’s personal information in the statement report on the circumstances of a drinking driver, and then, without the authority of the police officer to exercise his/her signature and seal from the above police officer, forged the Defendant’s circumstantial report on the driver’s name of the above report and issued the falsified report to the above F, who is aware of the fact.
The defendant is entitled to exercise.