logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고단53
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Counterfeiting a private signature or exercising a signature on the investigation ( group 53 of 2016);

A. At around February 7, 2015, the Defendant, as described in paragraph 2, entered on the roads in front of “Central Inn,” the petition rate of 21:20, the Defendant: (a) when driving B C with a alcohol content of 0.083% in the blood while driving C C with a flown vehicle at the speed of 0.083% on the roads in front of “Central Inn,” the Defendant, on the ground that the said vehicle was under the name of “E,” the Defendant, with the sign that the said vehicle was under one’s own birth, was under the name of “E,” had the intent to avoid punishment by driving the said vehicle in the name of “E” and issued the signature of each E with the intention of using each “E” as “E”, and the signature of each E in the name of “the name of the driver of the State and the statement report of the driver of the State.”

B. At around 13:35 on February 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) attended the police station guard for the Chungcheongbuk-gu Office, the petition-ro 60, the Gu office for the transportation investigation, and the one team office for the transportation investigation, and (b) signed the “E” on the column of “applicant (suspect)” of the electronic private seal while carrying out the investigation as if he/she was E; (b) continued to undergo the investigation from the police officer in charge of the police officer in charge; and (c) exercised the signature of each E’s name without authority in the “E” column of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the F after undergoing the investigation from the F; and (d) signed the “E” column of the document confirming the investigation process; and (e) forged each signature of the E name without authority for the purpose of exercising the signature on the “E” column; and (e) exercised the signature of each E name by issuing the F as if he/she was aware of the fact that the above signature was duly formed.

2. On February 7, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Drink 789) (Drink 2016 high-speed 789) from the front Do in front of the “high-speed ro,” the petition of which is located on the front of the “high-speed ro,” around February 7, 2015, to the front of the “central leisure” located on the north north of the same Gu.

arrow