All the judgment below is reversed.

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the above judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. The judgment of the court below that found the Defendants guilty of the facts charged of this case and sentenced the Defendants to a fine of KRW 10 million and KRW 3 million, and the summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows.

D, in order to ensure that Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) who is a woman of the Swiss Franc Republic of Korea’s nationality (hereinafter “Defendant B”) can enter Korea by obtaining a visa through international marriage with Korean men, as well as arranging Defendant B to make a report of marriage with Defendant A who has no genuine intention of marriage, and the Defendants, without the genuine intention of marriage, intend to make a false marriage by reporting marriage with each other without a genuine intention of marriage.

Accordingly, around June 24, 2013, Defendant A entered “A”, “B” and personal information in the husband’s column of the marriage report in the Gu’s civil petition office (former civil petition office) located in “A”, “B” and “B” in the Gu’s civil petition office (former civil petition office) and entered the marriage report into the marriage report as if he/she genuinely married, and submitted a written marriage report and a birth certificate, etc. issued by the French authority necessary for the marriage to a public official in charge of the public official in charge of the marriage, and had the said public official enter the above public official into the Defendant’s family relation information system into the Defendant’s family relation registration information system into the marriage between Defendant A and Defendant B.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with D to make a false report to the public official, thereby having recorded false facts in the family relation registration information system of Defendant A, which is an electronic record, and exercised a false official electronic record by having the information system on family relations, which includes a false marriage, stored and operated the information system on family relations.

2. The judgment of the court below and the summary of the grounds for appeal

A. The Defendants asserted that the lower court denied all of the instant crimes with the purport to view it as seen in the summary of the grounds for appeal following the lower judgment.

However, the lower court is as follows.