logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.01.08 2015고단2653
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 14, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for one year at the Cheongju District Court on the grounds of criminal fraud, the re-election of a false electronic record, and a false public electronic record, and the judgment on March 5, 2013 became final and conclusive.

[2] The Defendants: (a) using the fact that the Korea Housing Finance Corporation’s loan of workers’ house leasing loan to workers consists of document screening without due diligence; (b) prepared documents to obtain a loan, such as a false marriage report, false charter contract, and false labor contract; and (c) obtained a loan of workers’ house leasing fund from a financial institution; and (d) received the loan from the financial institution; and (c) shared

1. Defendant A

A. On March 30, 2009, the Defendant: (a) ordered F and G to report a marriage to obtain a loan from a public service center of the original Gu's civil petition among the events, such as the electronic records related to the lending of money; (b) F and G to the public official under the jurisdiction of F and G who are unable to know the name of the civil petition sealing of the original Gu's office as they were married normally even though they did not have any intent to marry; and (c) had the public official under the jurisdiction of F and G enter the registration information system of the electronic records, a public official under the jurisdiction of F and G, into the public official under the jurisdiction of F and G, as if they were married actually, and had the said public official under the jurisdiction of F and G enter the registration information system of the family relationship, an electronic record, a public official under the jurisdiction of the public official under the jurisdiction of F and G, which entered false facts as above.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with F and G, entered false facts in the public electronic records registration information system, which is an electronic records of family relations, and exercised the false electronic records.

B. On April 10, 2009, the Defendant, along with H (one named “I”), may have F and G obtain a loan license for the employee house lease fund, as described in paragraph (a).

arrow