beta
Text
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is a person engaged in salary production in his residence, and Defendant B is a person who is not on duty with the nationality of the People's Republic of China.
Defendant
A In the event that business funds for the supply of salaries have been needed, A agreed jointly with Defendant A to file a false marriage report for the purpose of solving problems such as: (a) Defendant B, who was known to the general public, was aware that money was much money and was to receive monetary assistance; (b) Defendant B, who entered the country as a tourist visa, and (c) providing education for postponement of the name and influence (M according to the record) of the grandchildren; and (d) giving an opportunity for extension of the period of stay at the expiration of the period of stay in Korea;
A. On March 6, 2013, at the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Civil Service Center, the Defendants are the parties to the marriage report, and the Defendants voluntarily enter the names and addresses of Defendant A’s son D and E in the guarantor column in the form of the guarantor, sign the false marriage report and submit a false marriage report to the public official in charge of the name-free family register who was unaware of the fact of the marriage report as if they were married normally with the genuine intent of marriage, and make the public official in charge of the name-free family register file a false report on the same electronic record as the original copy of the process certificate to enter the false fact of marriage in the electronic record register of family relations, which is an electronic record of the same electronic record as the original copy of the process certificate.
B. The report of the above false facts at the same time, at a place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, and a public official in charge of the registration of family relations in the name-free family relationship register may enter false facts into the electronic records registration information system, which is an official, and used it by having the public official in charge of the registration of family relations in the name-free family relationship register store in the system
2. The defendants' defenses and the judgment of the court below.