beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is a person who actually operates apartment cleaning, expenses, and disinfection service companies in the name of "Magan-gu C and 301" in Ansan-gu, Annsan-si.
When the apartment service company is selected by the company that submits the lowest estimated price at the time of the selection of the apartment service company, if the notice of the tender is publicly announced by the apartment management office, the defendant will request the same company to determine the estimated price for the tender in advance and then the other company will participate in the tender at a higher price, or at the request of the other company to participate in the tender at a higher price, and the defendant will gather the "oper" among the methods of participating in the tender at a higher price.
On December 1, 2014, when the Defendant publicly announced the bid for security service under the name of the E Apartment Management Director, the Defendant requested the F, which is the same kind of company, to request the participation of the Defendant according to the above mother, and the Defendant submitted the tender document at KRW 219,375,646 per annum by December 7, 2014, and “F, which is the company requested by the Defendant, shall submit the tender document at KRW 219,045,941 per annum by submitting the tender document at KRW 219,045,941 per annum.
Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the fairness of apartment security service bidding through fraudulent means.
2. The Defendant merely requested F to participate in the said bidding, and denied that there is no means to engage in a fraudulent act, such as requesting F to participate in the bidding and requesting the F to do so as to be stated in the facts charged.
Since the defendant denies the contents of the investigation protocol against the defendant in this court, it is not possible to use it as evidence, and only the statement of investigation report (Attachment of apartment bidding data) alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant made a fraudulent means such as requesting F to participate in the bidding and requesting the F to do so, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
3...