logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.09.21 2017고정750
입찰방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

(c) a tender, a request for participation in a tender, a pledge, and a calculation statement; and

1 The unit price per person shall be KRW 2,490,000.

A total of 24 months' 24 months' notice was sent and requested to participate in the bidding.

At around that time, the Defendant submitted a tender document in the amount of KRW 4,208,479,440 of the apartment estimate amounting to KRW 4,208,479, and the Defendant submitted the tender document at the request of the Defendant and participated in the bidding of the apartment cleaning service.

4. On January 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered into a bid notice for the selection of a guard station in Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu N Apartment Co., Ltd. in order to obtain the successful bid from (ju)C, and (b) entered into a bid with E, J, F, andO companies into the bid.

On January 22, 2015, the Defendant set the price in advance in order to obtain the successful bid of the C, and requested the e-mail (H) company to send a note to the e-mail (H) company with the content of “at least 2,50,000 won per person (at least 2,250,000 won per person)” after attaching the present materials and estimates for each company, and then to participate in the bid.

At that time, the defendant submitted the bidding documents to the above apartment, and the plaintiff companies received the request from the defendant submitted the bid documents with a higher estimate and participated in the bidding of the above apartment cleaning service.

As above, Defendant 1 participated in the apartment bid four times in the above four times, and thereby, caused the fairness of the reverse bid for the apartment security by fraudulent means.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The criminal place (in addition to 15 suspects 15 additional persons - collaborative enterprises), investigation report (in addition, e-mail analysis at 15 additional collaborative enterprises), investigation report (in addition, an application for a warrant of seizure for securing further collaborative enterprises and e-mail data);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiries, such as criminal history, and the text of the judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 315 and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, provided that Article 39(1)1.

arrow