logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.08 2017고정40
입찰방해
Text

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 5 million won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Defendant B is the representative of Seongbuk-gu Seoul E and 116 to the KCAB.

Defendant

B If the apartment management office makes a public notice of the bid at the apartment housing management office using the fact that the minimum estimated price is the successful bid in the selection of the apartment cleaning service company, the apartment cleaning service company decided the bid price in advance by requesting the same competitor to determine the bid price in advance and made the company participate in the bid at a higher price.

1) On September 3, 2014, Defendant B: (a) on September 3, 2014, in the public notice of the bid for cleaning service companies in Songpa-gu Seoul building G G building, Defendant B, in order to receive a successful bid by the F.S. in order to obtain a successful bid, Defendant B established a partnership company,

Defendant

B set the price in advance in order to receive the successful bid price by the K-Mail F. In September 12, 2014, the K-Mail requested the collaborative enterprise to send the detailed statement of the cleaning service tender "as a mail and to participate in the bidding at a discount."

Defendant

B submitted a bid document to apartment buildings around that time, and the said premium companies received the request from the above defendant submitted a bid document with a higher estimate and received a successful bid in the apartment cleaning service bidding.

2) On December 9, 2014, Defendant B sent a “statement of calculation” to the brightness in the bidding for I apartment cleaning services in the above manner, and received the award by participating in the bidding in the bidding.

3) On July 28, 2015, Defendant B sent a “statement of calculation” to the brightness in the J apartment cleaning service tender in the same manner as above and received a successful bid by participating in the bidding.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Investigation report (Attachment of F e-mail data);

1. A report on investigation (Attachment of data on apartment bidding);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of a joint business report);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 315 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. Aggravation concurrent crimes;

arrow