logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1974. 12. 24. 선고 73다1645 판결
[손해배상등][공1975.2.15.(506),8253]
Main Issues

Public project operators or the Central Land Expropriation Committee shall deal with persons other than owners of the expropriated land by negligence and make a ruling of expropriation without the participation of the true owners.

Summary of Judgment

If public project operators or the Central Land Expropriation Committee deal with a person who is not the owner of the land by negligence despite the knowledge of the owner of the land, and the procedure of expropriation is conducted without the participation of the real owner, the procedure of expropriation cannot be deemed to be null and void only on the ground of the illegality

[Reference Provisions]

Article 25 of the Land Expropriation Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Plaintiff

Defendant-Appellee

[Defendant-Appellant] Kandong Co., Ltd., Counsel for defendant-appellant-appellant

original decision

Daegu High Court Decision 72Na650 delivered on September 27, 1973

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

The plaintiff's grounds of appeal are determined.

According to the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, the court below held that the amount of △△△△-1 [It is clear that it is a clerical error in the lot number 2-1 omitted) of △△△△△△△ (2-1 omitted] was originally owned by the plaintiff. The court below held that the plaintiff was liable to expropriate the above land in order to develop the industrial site (the defendant company's factory site creation project) executed by the Do governor of the Gyeong-Gyeong-si, the non-party's land was registered as owned by the plaintiff on the land cadastre or the register, and that the non-party's land could not be treated as owned by the non-party and the consultation with the owner of the above non-party is not possible. The court below held that the non-party's new land was not illegal for the above non-party's 106,740 won as compensation for the above land and that the non-party's new land was not found to be the one of the non-party's new land owners. The court below held that the above non-party's new land was invalid.

All of the arguments are without merit, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Lee Byung-ho (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-대구고등법원 1973.9.27.선고 72나650