2020Du39549 Revocation of a decision to disclose information section;

A Stock Company

Law Firm LLC et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant

[Defendant-Appellee] Defendant 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3

Freeboard, Plusia

1. The Administrator of the Gyeonggi-do Office for Local Employment and Labor;

2. The Administrator of the Central and Local Employment and Labor Office:

[Defendant-Appellant] Plaintiff

[Defendant-Appellee] Defendant 1 and 3 others

B

Law Firm Seosung, Attorney Park Jae-spa, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Attorney Park Ji-su, and Correction decoration

Suwon High Court Decision 2019Nu12773 decided May 13, 2020

September 3, 2020

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants’ Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Defendants.

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, all appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants’ Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Defendants. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices

September 3, 2020

Justices Min You-sook

Justices Kim Jae-hyung

Justices Lee Dong-won

Chief Justice Noh Tae-ok