beta
Cases
2019du59820 Demanding the revocation of a recommendation for extension
Plaintiff, Appellee
A Stock Company
Attorney Hong-man, Justice Lee Jae-soo, Justice Lee Jae-young, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant
Defendant Appellant
The Minister of SMEs and Startups
Law Firm Sejong (LLC)
Attorney Kim private-public, Kim Yong-dam, Park Jong-gu, Park Jong-dae, Park Jong-dae, Park Jong-il
Intervenor joining the Defendant
B Partnership
The judgment below
Seoul High Court Decision 2019Nu39576 Decided October 25, 2019
Imposition of Judgment
March 12, 2020
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Of the costs of appeal, the supplementary intervenor is assessed against the supplementary intervenor, and the remainder is assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition
March 12, 2020
Judges
The presiding judge shall keep the record of the Justice
Justices Lee Dong-won
Justices Park Jong-young