logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2020.3.12.선고 2019두59820 판결
개점연기권고처분취소청구
Cases

2019du59820 Demanding the revocation of a recommendation for extension

Plaintiff, Appellee

A Stock Company

Attorney Hong-man, Justice Lee Jae-soo, Justice Lee Jae-young, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Defendant Appellant

The Minister of SMEs and Startups

Law Firm Sejong (LLC)

Attorney Kim private-public, Kim Yong-dam, Park Jong-gu, Park Jong-dae, Park Jong-dae, Park Jong-il

Intervenor joining the Defendant

B Partnership

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2019Nu39576 Decided October 25, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

March 12, 2020

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Of the costs of appeal, the supplementary intervenor is assessed against the supplementary intervenor, and the remainder is assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

March 12, 2020

Judges

The presiding judge shall keep the record of the Justice

Justices Lee Dong-won

Justices Park Jong-young

arrow