Cases
2019Da220991 Action
Plaintiff
A Stock Company
Law Firm Kcel, Counsel for the defendant-appellant
Attorney Lee Dong-young, Counsel for the defendant-appellant
Defendant
B
Law Firm higher than Law Firm
Attorney Nog Chang, Attorneys Noh Chang-ho, Hah-ho, and more
Intervenor joining the Defendant
C
The judgment below
Seoul High Court Decision 2018Na2046965 Decided February 14, 2019
Imposition of Judgment
June 13, 2019
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant’s Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Defendant.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by
Judges
Justices Kwon Soon-il
Justices Lee Ki-taik
Justices Park Jung-hwa
Justices Kim Jong-soo