logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.6.13.선고 2019다220991 판결
손해배상 청구의 소
Cases

2019Da220991 Action

Plaintiff

A Stock Company

Law Firm Kcel, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Attorney Lee Dong-young, Counsel for the defendant-appellant

Defendant

B

Law Firm higher than Law Firm

Attorney Nog Chang, Attorneys Noh Chang-ho, Hah-ho, and more

Intervenor joining the Defendant

C

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2018Na2046965 Decided February 14, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

June 13, 2019

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant’s Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Defendant.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Judges

Justices Kwon Soon-il

Justices Lee Ki-taik

Justices Park Jung-hwa

Justices Kim Jong-soo

arrow