2019du57923 Action demanding revocation of a disposition, including a corrective order

A Stock Company

Attorney Jeong Young-sik, Counsel for the defendant-appellant-appellant

Fair Trade Commission

Law Firm Hannuri, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Attorney Seo-young, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

B Partnership

Seoul High Court Decision 2018Nu76721 Decided October 2, 2019

February 27, 2020

The appeal is dismissed.

Of the costs of appeal, the costs of appeal are assessed against the Intervenor, and the remainder are assessed against the Defendant.

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

February 27, 2020

Justices Kim Jong-hwan

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Ansan-chul et al.

Justices Noh Jeong-hee