The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is as follows: (a) during the process of searching for goods from Incheon Airport, the investigation was initiated upon finding two forged driver’s license of an international selective cargo with the addressee G; (b) police officers called G’s address as indicated in the addressee’s column to obtain “the Defendant had known his/her domicile to China because he/she had been receiving documents in China”; and (c) at the time of calls, G made the Defendant call with the Defendant at the seat of the police officers; (d) at the time of call, the Defendant was indicted for forging the above vehicle driver’s license from the police station to the Changwon District Court 209No402; and (e) from the above court to the above court, the Defendant was indicted for forging the driver’s license of an automobile; and (e) the Defendant asked for the forgery of the driver’s license of an automobile; (e) notified the Defendant of his/her contact information by sending pictures necessary for the above Article to China; and (e) notified the Defendant of his/her departure order of his/her identity license of the Defendant 208.”

Even if there are no circumstances to see that the contents of the statement are contradictory or false, G and C's credibility and probative value of the statement.

Nevertheless, the court below rendered a not-guilty verdict by deeming that C and G’s statements are not reliable, and there is an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding facts.

2. Determination

(a)in this case;