logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.11.15 2013고단1621
공문서위조
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around May 2008, the Defendant: (a) requested the forgery of a driver’s license for a motor vehicle from D and one other; and (b) requested the Defendant to forge the driver’s license; (c) subsequently, the Defendant conspired in sequence to forge the driver’s license by requesting it to a forged technician whose name is unknown in China.

On May 208, at a place where the location is unknown, the Defendant sent a phone call to C, stating “A photograph of a person who is entitled to forge a driver’s license, and send it to China,” and notified D of his address and telephone number to D, and sent a photograph of certification of a person whose name and name are unknown to D, from August 2008 to September 2008, the above forged technician attached a photograph of certification of D on the driver’s license for E in the name of the Commissioner of the Busan Commissioner of the Busan Commissioner of the Local Police Agency, and attached a photograph of a person whose name is unknown on the driver’s license for F in the name of the Commissioner of the Chungcheongnam-Nam Commissioner of the Local Police Agency.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the counterfeit technician who is not known about D, C, and name, forged two driver's licenses under the name of the Commissioner of the Busan Local Police Agency and the Commissioner of the ASEAN Local Police Agency for the purpose of uttering.

2. Among the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, the evidence revealed that the defendant was involved in the instant crime is only a statement in the investigation agency of C and G, but the above two persons could not be examined as a witness in this court because their present whereabouts are not verified.

However, the investigative agency's statement is limited to the degree of probative value, which is essentially low compared to the statement of the original person who made the original statement. In particular, the court attendance and cross-examination are not conducted.

arrow