A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.

A seized driver's license (No. 1) shall be forfeited from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

On July 16, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Incheon District Court, and the suspended sentence was revoked on March 27, 201, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on July 8, 201. On February 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and six months at the Seoul High Court for forgery of public documents and became final and conclusive on the same day.

On August 2012, 2012, the Defendant requested the forgery of the driver’s license, which was made available in the course of searching the Internet, to the Defendant’s residence in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and issued the Defendant a photograph of the Defendant’s certification through the Internet mail.

Accordingly, at around that time, the above name-unfluencers made arbitrarily a copy of the driver's license under the name of the head of the Gyeonggi Provincial Police Agency by inserting the name and resident registration number C, address "C", "JDD 104-103", "JD 104-103", the aptitude test period from November 6, 2016 to May 5, 2017, and the defendant's photograph on plastic of size similar to the driver's license of the Republic of Korea.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the above forged slabs, forged a driver's license as an official document without authority for the purpose of uttering.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Requests for cooperation in investigation (whether the person is the same as image materials), and requests for an appraisal;

1. Previous convictions: References to criminal records, reports on previous convictions and results of confirmation, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the judgment;

1. Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The Defendant’s crime of this case with the reason for sentencing Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act is tried together with a crime during the period of repeated crime, or a crime of forging official document as stated in the first head of the judgment.