logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2013.07.12 2013고단264
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 264" Defendant is a person who drives Dunstren's car as his/her duties.

On January 22, 2013, at around 21:28, the Defendant driven a car with approximately KRW 2 km from the street in the vicinity of the e apartment complex in the front of the e apartment at the time of the game, under the influence of alcohol content of 0.075%.

"2013 Highest 868"

1. On July 2006, the Defendant: (a) requested the forgery of a driver’s license of a motor vehicle to be used for pretending as if the driver’s license was not for driving; (b) issued a photograph of the Defendant necessary for the above Article; and (c) notified the Defendant’s type G resident registration number and address.

Accordingly, the above fakeer arbitrarily produced one driver's license under the name of the director of the Incheon Provincial Police Agency by inserting G's resident registration number "H", address "KB," aptitude test period, and Defendant's photograph on July 7, 2013 to October 6, 2013, along with the size of plastics similar to the driver's license of Korea in China.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the above forged slabs, forged a driver's license as an official document without authority for the purpose of uttering.

2. On January 22, 2013, the Defendant displayed a forged public document driver’s license as if he were a true driver’s license when the Defendant was found to drive a drunk in front of the E apartment in light of light life and at around 21:28, the Defendant presented the forged public document to a slopeJ affiliated with the Mine Police Station Traffic Investigation Team, which was under the influence of alcohol, in order to abolish the unauthorized driving.

3. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On January 22, 2013, at around 21:28, the Defendant signed the “G” signing the signature of the notifying driver of the result of the crackdown on drinking driving of a portable information terminal (PDA), and signing the “PDA” on the vehicle’s signature.

arrow