logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.16 2013고정4778
일반교통방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Judgment of the court below]

1. On November 24, 2012, from around 16:10 to 18:30, the Defendant participated in the fourth national conference for solving D problems, which is being held by the “pan-national Support Committee for solving D Issues” at the Seoul plaza located in the Tae-ro Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

After the completion of the above national conference, from 18:30 to 18:55 on the same day, the Defendant occupied more than 800 participants in other assemblies, and attempted to enter the front door of thepar hotel and the front door door of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, and tried to enter the front door to the air space. The Defendant continued to go back to the police bus parked in order to manage the assembly by using the contact-type plastic bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with other participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

[2013 High Court 5684]

2. On February 23, 2013, from around 14:10 to 15:35, the Defendant attended the “Korean Workers’ Competition with Labor-Related Franchisium and friendly labor policies,” which was held by the E-group in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Automatic Seoul Station, and followed up approximately 3,50 participants of the above assembly with approximately 1,00 Seoul Station, going through the path leading from around 16:25 to 17:36 on the same day, while driving along the route leading to the private distance of the said assembly, the Defendant occupied 8 lanes or 7 lanes from the long distance of the entrance zone to the front line of the street to the front line and obstructed the traffic of the vehicle by going through the assembly.

As a result, the defendant conspired with the above participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic of the road.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. G statements;

1. Information report or report on the outdoor assembly held;

1. The photographic materials of each assembly or demonstration, the entire photograph of the D 11.24 D 1.1.1

arrow