Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-5829 ( April 18, 2017)
Title
(A) It constitutes a tax invoice different from the facts.
Summary
(In the first instance, the substance of the actual transaction is entirely carried out by the name borrower, and even if it is issued under the name of the name lender, it is reasonable to deem that the tax invoice under these names constitutes a false tax invoice.
Related statutes
Article 16 (Tax Invoice)
Cases
Disposition Disposition Imposing Value-Added Tax
Plaintiff-Appellant
AA
Defendant-Appellee
Head of Ansan Tax Office et al.
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court 2016Nu55829
Imposition of Judgment
August 23, 2017
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but their arguments on the grounds of appeal by the appellant fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per