logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2015. 08. 13. 선고 2015두45106 판결
(상고이유서부제출 기각) 이 사건 세금계산서는 그 공급자가 사실과 다르게 기재된 세금계산서에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2014Nu73694 (Seoul High Court 2015.05.27)

Title

(Dismissal of Submission) The tax invoice of this case constitutes a tax invoice entered differently from the actual facts of the supplier.

Summary

(Summary) Even if a transaction of supplying goods, etc. actually exists, the supplier shall also constitute a false tax invoice different from the issuer of the tax invoice.

Related statutes

Article 16 (Tax Invoice)

Cases

2015du45106 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing corporate tax, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellant

AAA, Inc.

Defendant-Appellee

Head of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court 2014Nu73694

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

As the appellant did not state the grounds of appeal in the petition of appeal filed, and did not submit the grounds of appeal within the statutory period, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, Article 429 of the Civil Procedure Act, and Article 5 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow