logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 01. 31. 선고 2017두64590 판결
(심리불속행)사실과 다른 세금계산서인지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-80856 ( September 15, 2017)

Title

(C) Whether it is a different tax invoice from the fact of hearing;

Summary

(1)A tax invoice issued by the supplier of goods, etc. in a disguised transaction different from the nominal owner of the tax invoice shall also constitute a false tax invoice.

Related statutes

Article 16 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2017Du64590 and disposition of revocation

Plaintiff

AA

Defendant

BB Director of the Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

January 31, 2018

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the allegation in the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow