logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.16 2015누54065
유족보상금부지급처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the cases being cited, deleted, or added as follows.

Article 61(1) of the Public Officials Pension Act and Article 52 of the Enforcement Decree of the Public Officials Pension Act, Article 61(1) of the Public Officials Pension Act and Article 52 of the Enforcement Decree of the Enforcement Decree of the Public Officials Pension Act, which states that “The deceased died of a disease due to official duties” of the first instance judgment, the Defendant made a disposition of compensation for survivors’ compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on April 14, 2014, on the ground that it is difficult to deem that there is a proximate causal relation with the deceased’s death due to official duties.”

In the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, "this atmosphere" in the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance and "as above" in the fourth part to the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance and "as above" in the fourth part and the fourth part to the fourth part.

On the 7th page of the first instance judgment, “the blood pressure and blood measurement results other than the first instance examination was found to be normal.” The blood pressure of the Plaintiff measured around March 5, 2013 was found to be the first instance judgment prior to the high blood pressure level exceeding normal blood pressure level.” In addition, the blood pressure of the Plaintiff measured around March 5, 2013 was found to be the first instance judgment.”

In the last sentence of the 7th judgment of the first instance, "the result of the entrustment of examination of medical records to the head of the Central University Hospital" shall be added.

Although it is somewhat controversial to recognize non-independentd diseases as an independent risk factor, non-independentd diseases are generally known as an independent risk factor. E) It is impossible to indicate to the deceased whether the occurrence of the cardio-border color was occurred even in the absence of overwork and overwork.

arrow