1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the judgment is used or added as described in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Each “Witness” of the Parts 2, 9, 7, 17, and 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “Witness of the court of first instance”; each “Plaintiff” of the Parts 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, and 13 under the table of 14, 6, 7, and 15 attached to the table of 15 shall be deemed to be “Plaintiff A”.

Part 2 of the first instance judgment, "(department: 4 team leader: team leader)" shall be appointed as "(in the case of a plaintiff A, the team leader (in the case of a plaintiff A) or the head of the office (in the case of a plaintiff B)". Part 2, "in the case of a court of first instance, the employer shall be referred to as "A and the employment worker" shall be added.

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance, the Labor Standards Act and other Acts shall be amended to “6. Other conditions and conditions”.

From Nos. 7 to 8 of the first instance judgment, the part on “the plaintiffs are neither nor trusted by them” shall be written in each of the subparagraphs A through 35 (including the serial number) and the result of the plaintiff’s party principal examination conducted by the plaintiff A to the effect that it is difficult to regard the plaintiffs as workers under the Labor Standards Act who provided labor for the purpose of wages in a user-subsidiary relationship with the defendant, and that there is no other evidence to recognize it otherwise.

The building of this case in the first instance judgment Nos. 10, 13, and 14 each "the building of this case" is each "the commercial building of this case", and the 11th, 19, and 20th, "E shop" (hereinafter "the commercial building of this case") are each "the commercial building of this case".

No. 12, No. 3 and No. 4 of the first instance judgment, “Plaintiff A proposes to H a sale price of KRW - KRW 2.6 billion” and “Plaintiff A recognizes the pharmacy reading points of the store No. 113 and No. 114 in relation to the business category of the store of this case,” thereby, the instant commercial building No. 403.