logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.07.20 2017나2073755
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases.

The second sentence of the judgment of the first instance was purchased, “The gravel, etc. scattered on the land prior to the division was supplied to the construction site of the Gyeong-do Highway, and possessed the land prior to the division.”

Nos. 2, 11 through 12 of the first instance judgment, “from around that time, in the land before the division of this case from around 1975 to before the date of the division,” the first instance judgment “from the land before the division of this case,” has been put into effect.

On the 2nd page of the judgment of the first instance, the "Defendant" in the 20th part of the judgment of the second instance shall be "the Dong B shall be raised "."

The first written judgment of the court of first instance in the first written judgment of the court of first instance in the first written judgment of the court of first instance in the year of 1978 shall be changed to "1975".

On the 3rd page of the judgment of the first instance, the defendant in the 5th sentence " shall be punished by "the defendants, who are the successors of the deceased B," "."

On the third side of the judgment of the first instance, the "Defendant" in the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to the "Defendant".

On January 2, 2015, the first instance judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant") Nos. 5, 6, "Around January 2015, 2015" shall be applied.

Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the defendant" in Part 7 shall be added to "the deceased B".

On the 5th page of the first instance judgment, the “B” from around 1978 was made from around 1975.

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance, part 14 and part 6 of the 10th page 10 shall be referred to as "the witness of the first instance court".

On the 6th page of the first instance judgment, the following is added to “(in addition, it is difficult to easily understand that the Plaintiff, without confirming a sales contract, purchased the land from C, other than the holder of the title on the real estate registration injury, and believed C to be the owner of the land before the partition.”

On the 6th page of the first instance judgment, the defendant's "the defendant" in the 19th sentence shall be added to "the deceased B".

Part VII of the judgment of the first instance is set forth in the second sentence.

arrow