logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.05 2017누43724
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. In light of the evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings submitted in the first instance court and the trial, the fact-finding and the judgment of the first instance court are deemed legitimate, unless the grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the first instance while filing an appeal are significantly different from the contents alleged in the first instance court.

Therefore, the reasoning of this court concerning this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, this court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. “3” shall be added to “A 1 and 2” in the last sentence of the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is added or written. “5” shall be added to “A 1 and 2” in the 6th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance.

No. 7 of the first instance judgment, the second part of the second part of the second part of the judgment, "I see it, and Gap evidence No. 10 shall not interfere with the above recognition."

On the seventh anniversary of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the plaintiff's above assertion" was cited as "the intervenor's above assertion".

Part 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the assertion of the witness" in Part 17 shall be raised as "the intervenor's above assertion".

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow