A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Forging a private document;

A. On January 15, 2013, the Defendant entered “C”, “D”, “B” in the resident registration number column, and “C” in the applicant customer column in the name column in the mobile phone opening agency located in the sk mobile phone name change contract, and forged one copy of the mobile phone name change contract in the name of “C”, which is a private document concerning the rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising the rights and obligations.

B. On January 17, 2013, the Defendant forged an application form in the name of F, which is a private document on rights and obligations, with a view to arbitrarily signing and exercising the right and obligations, at the mobile phone opening agency located in the name of F, stating “F” in the name column using the pen.

(c)

On January 29, 2013, the Defendant forged one copy of the new service contract under the name of F, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising the right and obligations, after stating “F”, “G”, “G”, and “F” in the address column in the name column of the sk service new contract at the mobile phone opening agency located in the name of F, resident registration number column, “G”, and “G”, and “F” in the customer column.

(d)

On February 22, 2013, the Defendant, at the mobile phone opening agency located on the sk mobile phone name change contract, forged a copy of the name change contract in the name column of the sk mobile phone name change contract, stating “C”, “D”, “C” in the resident registration number column, “D”, and “C” in the applicant customer column, and arbitrarily signed and executed on the name next to the applicant customer column.

2. The Defendant, at each time and place described in subparagraph 1-A, b, c, and d, exercised the foregoing investigation document by delivering two copies of the forged B, C’s mobile phone name change contract, one application form, and one new service contract form as if they were duly formed to the employees under the name of the Defendant, who knew of the forgery.