The punishment of the accused shall be determined by four months of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 12, 2015, the Defendant stated “D”, “E” and “E” as “D” and “D” in the name column on May 12, 2015, at the mobile phone sales store of the Defendant’s operation in Gwangju Northernbuk-gu B 104, the Defendant stated “C” a new service contract in the name of the Defendant, which is a private document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-related document-

Then, the Defendant, at the “H” agency located in Seo-gu in Gwangju on the same day, presented the forged mobile phone service new contract, etc. as if they were genuinely formed to a non-employee of the victim Ecom Telecom Co., Ltd. who knew of such fact, and then, he was provided with portable telephone and communications services equivalent to the total market price of KRW 1,272,640 from the injured party, and acquired property and financial gains equivalent to the same amount.

2. "2016 Highest 5,901".

A. On November 2014, the Defendant forged private documents (related to the fabrication of the name change contract) 1) on November 201, 2014, at the mobile phone sales store located in the Defendant’s 104 in Gwangju Northern-gu J. J. 104, the Defendant signed the name “K”, “I”, “I”, “I”, “L”, “M”, “M”, “I”, “I”, and “I” in the customer column in the name of the Defendant, “I”, and “I” on the mobile phone name change contract kept in that place.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the change contract in the name of the mobile phone in I, a private document on rights and obligations.

2) The Defendant’s use of the foregoing investigation document is a one-time mobile phone, forged as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).