logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.18 2017고단1020
개인정보보호법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 1020] The Defendant is a person who operates a mobile phone sales store under the trade name of “D” in Daegu Dong-gu C.

1. No person who violates the Personal Information Protection Act shall divulge personal information he/she has become aware of in the course of performing his/her duties, provide such information to any third person without authority, or receive such personal information for profit or for an illegal

On January 2016, the Defendant received a copy of the passport of Chinese people from the end-to-end pre-paid so that he had the mind to open and sell the pre-paid phone in the name of these Chinese people.

The Defendant, at around January 27, 2016, received a copy of the passport of “F for Chinese tourists” from the Defendant’s Internet NVbere e-mail account (E) in order to open illegal pre-paid phone in the name of Chinese people at the office of “D” around January 27, 2016, as well as a copy of the passport of “F for Chinese tourists” / [1] as the content of the previous passport / [1] from January 27, 2016 to the same year.

5. up to 17. A total of 281 Chinese personal information (a copy of passport passport information) was provided for the purpose of making profit.

2. The Defendant had a mind to open a prepaid phone using personal information acquired at “D” office, such as the foregoing 1.

On January 27, 2016, the Defendant: “Name: F, passport number: G: applicant: F at his/her discretion, etc. and forged one copy of the prepaid phone contract in the name of F, a private document concerning the duty of rights by signing the contract in the name of F, a private document, for the purpose of exercising the credit card opening of the prepaid phone in around January 27, 2016, with the aim of exercising the credit card opening of the credit card company, and from January 27, 2016 to January 27, 2016.

5. During the period of 17.17., 325 of the prepaidphone agreement is forged, and around the time of each forgery, a radio operator who is aware of such forged circumstances in the said D office, “A business operator”, “a large person of the dispute resolution”, and “a large person”.

arrow