A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operated a “F” mobile phone sales store in Daejeon Dong-gu E.

1. No person who manages or has processed personal information in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act shall divulge personal information he/she has become aware of in the course of performing his/her duties or provide such personal information to any third person without authority, and no one shall knowingly receive such personal information for profit or for

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) conspired to open pre-paid mobile phone through the Internet car page’s passport information acquired by him/her from his/her travel company; (b) received a copy of the AG passport issued by the above-mentioned “F office” by e-mail from his/her name in the above-mentioned “F office on February 1, 2016; and (c) received a total of 22 Chinese passport information from around that time to February 2, 2016, as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, from around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided with personal information that he knew in the course of his business in collusion with another person.

2. The Defendant forged a private document with a view to gaining profits by opening a prior mobile phone using the Chinese passport information that he/she acquired through a travel company as above.

On February 1, 2016, the Defendant, at the above “F office” office, forged an application for subscription to prepaid phones for the purpose of exercising 22 times in total, as described in the separate crime list, from around that time to February 2, 2016, by stating “AG”, “AH”, “AH”, “AG”, or “AG” in the name column of the application form for subscription to the prepaid mobile phone, in the passport number column, and signing it next thereto.

3. The Defendant holding the aforementioned investigation document in collusion with K who operates a mobile phone agent chain, and filed an application for subscription to a forged prepaid mobile phone as described in the foregoing paragraph 2.