logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.10.14 2015고정386
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person engaged in the business of providing Internet game facilities (registration number: Pohang-gu Office E at port) under the trade name of "DPC bank" in South-gu Office C (1st floor) at port.

Defendant

B It is unclear whether it is an employee of the above game room, and this part of the facts constituting the crime of this case is deleted ex officio because it does not affect the corresponding elements of the crime of this case.

Defendant

A1) No game products related business entity may allow others to gamble or perform other speculative acts using a game product, or leave them to do so. Nevertheless, from April 16, 2015 to April 28, 2015, the Defendant installed a “337 Game” in the said PC to six computers from around April 16, 2015, and made customers receive cash and directly charge game money, and made customers engage in speculative acts using a game product such as allowing them to receive money by account transfer from the game money exchange business entity (one name F) with the contents of the game products different from those of the rating.

Nevertheless, as stated in the above, the Defendant provided 337 games to customers for their use, and directly received cash, and charged game money to customers, and provided game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Management Committee.

B. From April 25, 2015 to April 20, 2015, the Defendant, despite being aware that the said A had customers engage in speculative acts using the game products, such as “A-1” in the PC room, aided and abetting customers to engage in speculative acts using the game products, by phone calling to an indivated money changers (F) so that customers may receive money.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A-.

arrow