(영문) 창원지방법원 2012.09.20 2012고단805

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2012.09.20 2012고단805

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates DPCs from 102 to 102 of the 1st floor of the building located in the window of Changwon-si.

A game products related business entity shall not allow others to gamble or perform other speculative acts using the game products or not leave the game so that they may do so, and shall not provide for the use of the game products with contents different from those rated by the Game Rating Board, and shall not engage in business of exchanging or arranging exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of the game products.

Nevertheless, from March 24, 201 to December 16, 201 of the same year, the Defendant provided the aforementioned PC room with seven computer units installed and provided them to customers with a scoophones in which there is a store manager (scoos, Baduks, and scoos) other than the contents rated by the Game Rating Board, and provided them with a coophones equivalent to the same amount of cash received from customers, and provided them with a coophones through the Internet, and allowed them to walk up with the above coo games through the Internet, walk up with the game money entered in the coophones, Baduks, and scoos with other games users connected to the Internet, and then finished the game, they received cash transfer of the amount of money equivalent to the remaining game money from which their deposit account numbers are entered, deducted the prescribed fees from the head office operated by the said coo game site. The Defendant acquired a certain portion of the above fee as profits.

As a result, the defendant provided customers with contents different from the rating by the Game Rating Board to use game products, and caused them to perform speculative acts, and conducted a business of arranging exchange of results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Responses with the results of appraisal;

1. Suppression photographs;

1. The application of the Act and subordinate statutes of the seizure protocol and the list of search and seizure shall be 1.

유사 판례

-서울남부지방법원 2016.12.02 2016고단4639

-대전지방법원 2019.12.19 2019고단3989

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.02.15 2012고정6953

-대전지방법원 2019.10.10 2019고단3063

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.10.19 2016고정684