The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the crime; (b) the Defendant’s age; (c) the amount of damage; and (d) the amount of damage was not significant; (d) there was the history of punishment for the same crime; (e) the crime committed during the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime; (e) theft of the property of the convenience store he/she has served; and (e) the crime committed against many and unspecified persons; and (e) the damage was recovered or did not have agreed with the victim; and (e) the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because it was

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.