The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (for six months of imprisonment, six months of imprisonment, six months of suspended sentence, two years of suspended sentence) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too uneasy and unreasonable, in light of the following: (a) the confession of the crime against Defendant A and reflects the fact that it is a small amount of damage; (b) the fact that it has been punished several times of the same crime; (c) the fact that it is a crime committed during the period of suspension of execution; and (d) the theft of money and valuables by intrusion upon the guest room in which the victim is accommodated; and (e) the fact that the nature of the crime is not good.

B. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too uneasy and unreasonable, in light of the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime against Defendant B, the amount of damage, the amount of damage, the amount of damage, the amount of damage, the amount of damage reimbursement, the amount of age, the amount of damage reimbursement, the amount of damage, the amount of the same juvenile protection disposition several times in favor of the same crime; and (b) the theft of money and valuables by intrusion into the guest room administered by the victim, which are disadvantageously unfavorable

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.