Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

In the text of the judgment of the court below, the "victims without the name of the victim" is called.

1. Reasons for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the factors such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., comprehensively taking account of the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc.; (b) the Defendant’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable, taking into account the following factors: (c) the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, the total amount of damage, the total amount of damage, the fact that there is still a wide range of punishment for the same crime; (d) the victims’ residence or structure was invaded at night; and (e) the property was stolen by intrusioning the victims’ residence or structure at night; and (e) the commission of CCTV storage devices installed at the scene to conceal the crime was committed; and (e) some of the crimes were arrested and released in the case of this case; and (e) the damage was

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. Since it is obvious that there are some errors in the judgment of the court below, it is decided to correct them in accordance with Article 25 of the Rules on