The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal (one year of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The court below’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of all the sentencing conditions, such as Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., in light of the following: (a) the fact that the Defendant’s confessions and reflects the fact that the gains acquired by the Defendant are not large; (b) the fact that the Defendant was under suspension of execution due to the crime of the same kind, but rather, was committed at the same place; (c) the act of arranging sexual trafficking against unspecified persons or many, using the Internet; and (d) the fact that the Defendant refused to attend during the course of receiving the investigation of the crime of this case and escaped, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.