The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (three million won in penalty) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be too uneasy and unfair, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the confession of the crime, the first offense, the first offense, the gains acquired by the instant crime, the fact that the Defendant was not significant; and (b) the head of the Tong who has leased the Defendant has yet to use it for an illegal sports soil crime; and (c) the head of the Tong has not been less and less than the nature of the crime.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.