The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant’s age, sex, motive, frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered to be disadvantageous and unfair in light of all the sentencing conditions, including the following: (a) the confession of the crime; (b) the confession of the crime; (c) the degree of damage was not excessive; (d) some victims were not subject to punishment; (c) the victims had the record of being punished for the same kind of crime; (d) some crimes were committed during the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime; (e) the victims’ property was stolen through several times; and (e) the crime was committed by intrusion upon the victim’s structure he/she worked at night; and (e) the continuous crime was committed even after being investigated by the investigative agency; and (e) all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, motive, frequency of the crime; (e) the number of crimes; and (e) the circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.