Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the director of C in the petition district B, and D is the person who works as a infant care teacher of the 7th Infant Care Center without qualification as a infant care teacher, and E and F is the person who has a infant care teacher's license.

1. The head of a nursery school or infant care teacher who violates the Infant Care Act (Prohibition of Lending Titles) shall not allow any third person to perform the duties of the head of a nursery school or infant care teacher by using his/her name or the name of the nursery school or

A. The Defendant conspiredd with E, from April 2016 to May 13, 2016, leased E’s infant care teacher’s license to D and had D work as infant care teacher for the 7th half of the pertinent year.

B. The Defendant, in collusion with F, is obviously a clerical error as stated in the indictment from January 2, 2017 to February 28, 2017.

Until now, the above C lent F's infant care teacher license to D and caused D to work as a infant care teacher of the 7th half of the year.

2. He/she shall not receive any subsidy in violation of the Infant Care Act (illegal receipt of such subsidy), violation of the Subsidy Management Act, or fraud or other wrongful means, or use any subsidy;

A. In collusion with D and E, the Defendant applied for treatment improvement expenses for E, special service expenses for childcare teachers to rural childcare teachers, special service expenses for childcare teachers, and teachers’ work improvement expenses, etc. in collusion with D and E, from April 2016 to May 2016, by linking D and E with the aforementioned integrated childcare information system, and registering E as the above childcare care teachers (Seoul District Teachers) by registering D using the aforementioned integrated childcare information system, but, in fact, E only lent the certificate of infant care teachers to D for the above period and did not provide infant care services in the 7th of the pertinent year.

Nevertheless, the defendant, in collusion with D and E, deceiving the petitioner office and the Republic of Korea in the above manner, and deceiving them to improve the treatment of infant care teachers from the victim petition office.