logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.10.15 2015고단752
영유아보육법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for four months, respectively.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The head of E Child Care Center (Monthly Head), the head of the defendant A, the head of the facility of the above Child Care Center, and the F shall have served as the child care teacher, while G shall not be qualified as the child care teacher.

1. Infant Care Violation;

A. Although Defendants were unable to receive subsidies or appropriate subsidies by fraud or other improper means, Defendant A received subsidies from around November 1, 2014 to around 2-3 days, and filed a report on appointment to the system as if retired F had continued to work. The Defendants conspired to receive subsidies from the F in the first and second early January 2014, and applied for basic childcare fees for entering F into the aforementioned childcare center bethers (0-2 years-2 years-2 years-2 years-2) in the childcare integration system as a childcare teacher on December 96, 2014; and received KRW 1,083,00 from each of the above childcare centers in the name of the above childcare center on January 1, 2014; and received KRW 200,000 in total from around 1, 2083,00 to around 13, 201; and received KRW 1,000 in the name of each of the above childcare center on January 1, 2014 and around 213,2014.

B. The head of the crime committed by Defendant A, or the head of the child-care center or the head of the child-care center, using his name or the name of the child-care center, is prohibited from allowing another person to perform the duties of the head of the child-care center or lending his certificate of qualification to another person, and the defendant is not the other party, in collusion with F and G, respectively. The defendant, from November 3, 2014 to January 26, 2015, F had G conduct the duties of the child-care center using his name, and G had the other party perform the duties of the child-care center.

2. Defendant B, in collusion with each other in accordance with the direction of Defendant A, is ineligible as an infant care teacher instead of the former head office at the Child Care Center around December 20, 2015 and the latter who is not working as an infant care teacher.

arrow