logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1986. 12. 9. 선고 86누569 판결
[석유판매업허가취소처분취소][집34(3)특,463;공1987.2.1.(793),172]
Main Issues

(a)the method in which administrative authority is delegated and in the case of internal delegation;

(b)where delegation of administrative authority is allowed;

Summary of Judgment

(a) Delegation of administrative authority is a change in the legal attribution of the authority to transfer a particular authority to the delegated authority under law, and its internal delegation is that to the subsidiary authority or subordinate administrative authority in fact in order to promote the convenience of internal administrative affairs of the administrative authority. Therefore, in the case of delegation of authority, the delegated authority may exercise its authority in its own name; or in the case of internal delegation, the delegated authority may only exercise its authority in its own name, but not in its own name.

(b) insofar as the delegation of administrative authority changes the legal attribution of its authority, it shall be recognized only when law permits that delegation.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 13(3) and 23(1) of the Petroleum Business Act; Article 25(1)2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Petroleum Business Act; Article 25(1)2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Petroleum Business Act; Article 2-1-49 of the attached Table 1-7 of the Enforcement Decree of the Petroleum

Plaintiff-Appellee

Plaintiff

Defendant, the superior, or the senior

Attorney Park Sang-chul, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 86Gu66 decided July 10, 1986

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

The delegation of so-called administrative authority is a change in the legal attribution of the authority to transfer a specific authority to the delegated authority in accordance with the law, and its internal delegation is to have the subsidiary authority or subordinate administrative authority practically exercise its authority in order to promote the convenience of internal administrative affairs of the administrative authority. Therefore, in the case of the delegation of authority, the delegated authority may exercise its authority in its own name. However, in the case of internal delegation, the delegated authority can only exercise its authority in its own name, or in the case of internal delegation, it cannot be done in its own name.

In addition, as long as the delegation of authority is changed in the legal attribution of authority, it shall be recognized only when the law permits the delegation of authority.

According to Article 13(3) of the Petroleum Business Act, a power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power, Article 23(1) of the same Act, and Article 25(1)2 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, a power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power shall be delegated to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayor, or Do governor. Meanwhile, according to attached Table 1-49 of attached Table 1 of Article 2 of the Regulations on the Internal Delegation of Duties (Evidence No. 9) of the Cheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, the power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power-driven power is delegated to the head of the Si/Gun, and even according to Article 7 of the same Act, the head of the Si/Gun bears the authority to cancel permission under his own name.

In the same purport, the court below is just in holding that the defendant's disposition of this case was invalid by a person without authority, and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles as otherwise alleged.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Lee Byung-su (Presiding Justice)

arrow