Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 16,783,785, and KRW 1 million to the plaintiff B, and KRW 800,000 for each of them.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Basic facts 1) Plaintiff A is a vehicle E around 12:10 on February 10, 2014 (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”).
) A driver was driving and committed in the vicinity of the Griju station located in the Griju F at the time, and a stop signal was sent to the front line of the front line, and one cost of a numberless vehicle was stopped according to the above stop signal, and the plaintiff A also suspended the plaintiff's vehicle that he had driven after the above vehicle. The non-party H is limited to the vehicle I (hereinafter referred to as the "Ariju vehicle").
2) The Plaintiff 1, who had driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle and stopped as seen above, had the Plaintiff 1 suffered injury, such as pressure duplicating No. 1. (hereinafter “instant accident”).
(2) Plaintiff B’s wife, Plaintiff C, and D are those of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer of the harming vehicle.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, and 7; the result of this court’s commission of physical examination to the president of an ordinary university hospital; the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts, the defendant is responsible for compensating the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the operation of a melting vehicle.
Furthermore, considering the background, causes, etc. of the instant accident, it is difficult to view that Plaintiff A contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage therefrom, etc., and thus, Plaintiff A’s negligence should not be considered.
2. In principle, the period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and the amount less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.
The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month.
On the other hand, the claims of the parties not mentioned separately will be rejected.
1) Income and operation period Plaintiff A shall be an adjoining work, as stated in the “basic matters” in the attached table of calculation of personal information damages.