logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2015.01.09 2014가단8741
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,522,440 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from December 14, 2013 to January 9, 2015.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On December 14, 2013, Nonparty B driven a C Freight Vehicle (hereinafter “AR”) around 16:00 on December 14, 2013, and operated two-lanes of the two-lane road in the front of the CF apartment zone in the CF at the Jinju-dong, Jinju-si, the lower part of the Plaintiff’s Mati-ray vehicle in the signal signal line, which was in front of the FF at the upper intersection, was shocked, thereby causing the Plaintiff to suffer an injury on the left-hand opening of the back part.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). On the other hand, the Defendant is the insurer of a sea-going vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 2 (including each number), the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the director of the authorized Busan Hospital affiliated with the authorized university of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is responsible for compensating the plaintiff for the damages caused by the plaintiff's damage caused by the operation of a melting vehicle.

Furthermore, considering the circumstances and causes of the instant accident, it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff contributed to the occurrence of the instant accident, and thus, the Plaintiff’s negligence should not be considered.

2. In principle, the period of time for calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and the amount less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the discount method that deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month.

On the other hand, the claims of the parties not mentioned separately will be rejected.

According to the records in Gap evidence 5 and 1 to 25, the plaintiff is deemed to have engaged in work as a tree trees. Thus, the daily income shall be calculated based on the daily wage of the construction wood hole. However, according to the result of the physical examination entrusted to the head of Jin University affiliated Busan Baum Hospital in this court, the plaintiff shall be deemed to have engaged in work as a qualified tree trees.

arrow